| |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;) |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 175
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,256 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER They prefer BMW's system, but admit the combination of both system would be perfect. Also read - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER Introductions of - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER - ONLY REGISTERED AND ACTIVATED USERS CAN SEE ALL LINKS - CLICK HERE TO REGISTER |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 175
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,256 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision They like BMW system better since it requires less attention from driver. MB system projects B/W high resolution pic of a road ahead in a screen instead of speed dial (speed info is displayed as a horizontal bar), while BMW system projects B/W high-contrast image of road in central screen - where warm objects (especially people, animals) are projected as bright white silhuetts on gray background. Driver more easy recognizes the dangerous object on the road on BMW's system - since the projected image is more alerting. MB system is more distracting since driver has to concentrate more on image reading / recognizing. But BMW system only projects objects that radiate heat, while MB's system show all the objects ahead (e.g. parked car on the street, or a stone) - but are difficult to recognized in the screen. BMW claims that for such cases (parked cars with reflecrtors or stones) high beam is sufficient - especially because MB's system can detect the objects only 150m ahead, whil BMW's can do it 300m ahead. I wonder how both systems work in snow, rain & fog conditions. ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 175
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,256 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Quote:
MB: 1.925 Euros (available in S-class) | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: London & Gothenburg
Posts: 11,869
Thanks: 1,479
Thanked 2,768 Times in 1,376 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Thanks for the info Tine. Somehow I feel that this is an nessecary option. By the time you have tried to identify if it's a human, sheet of flying paper or creature, and hit the brake you will allready have hit what ever's infront of you. Although gangsters might like nightvision for assasinations during cold and dark winter afternoons. ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Fanatic ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,845
Thanks: 286
Thanked 254 Times in 170 Posts
![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Although the image projected by the BMW may show more of a contrast, I dont see how they would come to the conclusion its the better system since it still relies on differences in heat between the object and its surrounds as with all the old systems fitted to Lexus and Caddilac vehicles. The Mercedes system picks up all objects regardless of wheather they are dead or alive. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 175
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,256 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Interesting facts: - MB system doesn't work under 15km/h speed, since IR light beams coud hurt human eyes - In paranoid US market BMW would advertise or just stress in the system description that the system could detect hidden robbers / attackers in parking lots, drak areas, etc. - BMW system is unable to recognize cold object (like stones, parked cars) on the road, MB does - MB system is much more complex and more expensive to build - indicating BMW woud make more profit from the system |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Connoisseur Moderator Emeritus ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 175
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,256 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Quote:
They've driven the cars and found out BMW system is more driver friendly. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Me for President ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 17,346
Thanks: 1,289
Thanked 5,176 Times in 2,122 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: AMS: MB NightViewAssist vs. BMW NightVision Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| ams, bmw, mb, nightviewassist, nightvision |