| |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| Internal Combustion My favorite car vs. your favorite car go here.. Boys with big toys behave! ;) |
| View Poll Results: WHICH? | |||
| S65 AMG | | 28 | 59.57% |
| Flying Spur | | 19 | 40.43% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 289
Thanked 144 Times in 99 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Ok I thought this would be kind of interesting comparison because in terms of price and engine size the most comparable car the the S65 is actually the Bentley flying Spur. Their prices are similar and their performance is very similar. So, what would you rather have, an S65 AMG or a Bentley Flying Spur. Both very sexy cars, indeed. Bentley Flying Spur: Engine Type: W12, Twin-turbo Displacement cu in (cc): 366 (5998) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 560(411) / 6100 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 479(650) / 1600 Redline at RPM: n.a. Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 275/40 R19 Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: 208.9 × 83.4 × 58.2 Weight lb (kg): 5456 (2475) Performance Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 4.9 Top Speed mph (km/h): 195 (312) Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a. Price: $170,000 S65 AMG: Engine Type: V12, Biturbo Displacement cu in (cc): 365 (5980) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 604(450) / 4800 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 738(1000) / 2000-4000 Redline at RPM: 5950 Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 255/40 ZR19 - 275/40 ZR19 Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: n.a. Weight lb (kg): n.a. Performance Acceleration 0-60 mph s: 4.2 Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 13/20 (n.a.) Price: $169,000 S65 ![]() ![]() ![]() not an S65 (but theres just not enough photos of S65 interior) ![]() FLYING SPUR ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Matt; 02-06-2006 at 10:53 PM.. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sweden Gothenburg
Posts: 14,443
Thanks: 322
Thanked 1,850 Times in 963 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? lol one of those pics with the mocca steering is the CLK DTM PS The FS is a frog.. and the S65 is the hottest sedan on earth.. this could not be easier for me.. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 289
Thanked 144 Times in 99 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? I dont think so^. I think the Spur is elegant and more discreet than the flashy S 65. notice: these cars are direct competitors, both have the same price, both have 12 cylinder engines, both are twin turbo charged. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 253
Thanked 295 Times in 192 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65! it`s supposed to have flash, it`s an AMG unlike the normal S-Class. Plus the S-Class has gotton quit a few awards, it`s a winner! ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 3,066
Thanks: 124
Thanked 412 Times in 205 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
Unfortunetely I haven't seen either of these cars in person so I just have no idea. | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 289
Thanked 144 Times in 99 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? look at the wood in the Bentley...Its just beutiful. I personally like the interior of the Spur better. Its so "lush" and cushy yet the wood is classy and very beautiful (it looks like oak or something). |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Connoisseur ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,979
Thanks: 605
Thanked 894 Times in 380 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? S65, Flying Spur is OK. Saw one yesterday and I thought it was just OK, they didn't do enough to differentiate the sedan from the coupe. Boring design, IMO. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Devotee ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Kansas City, USA.
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 253
Thanked 295 Times in 192 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: S65 vs. Bentley Flying Spur? Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bentley, flying, s65, spur |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Gear - Bentley Flying Spur. | Yannis | Sound and Vision | 7 | 02-07-2006 01:51 PM |